Skip to main content

Qualifying and Prioritizing Requests

Filter and score content requests to focus on high-impact, low-effort projects that align with business goals and regulatory needs.

Updated over a week ago

Not every training request should go straight into production. To make the best use of your team's time and energy, it’s essential to qualify requests and prioritize them based on business value and effort.


βœ… Qualifying Questions to Ask

Before you start working on a request, confirm that it meets basic criteria:

  • Is there a regulatory or legal driver?

  • Is the request tied to a business goal or KPI?

  • Has the content already been approved as part of a process/product release?

  • Is there a clearly defined audience?

  • Is a subject matter expert (SME) available?

  • Can the content be reused or repurposed elsewhere?

  • Is the timeline realistic given current workload?

🚩 If most answers are "no," consider redirecting, bundling it into a future update, or deprioritizing.


πŸ”’ Prioritization Framework: Impact vs. Effort

Use a simple scoring model or matrix to assess each request:

Priority Factor

Low (1 pt)

Medium (2 pts)

High (3 pts)

Business Impact

Cosmetic only

Supports key goal

Critical objective

Audience Size

Small team

Department-level

Org-wide impact

Regulatory Risk

None

Moderate oversight

High risk/fines

Effort to Build

High effort

Moderate effort

Quick win

Add up the points and assign a tier:

  • Tier 1 (8–12 pts): High priority – Start ASAP

  • Tier 2 (5–7 pts): Medium priority – Schedule based on availability

  • Tier 3 (0–4 pts): Low priority – Consider bundling or deferring

🧠 Tip: Review scores monthly with your CoE or L&D team to ensure alignment.


πŸ“Œ Next Step:

With your requests prioritized, make your process transparent. Learn how to document and share your workflow in Creating a Content Governance Charter.

Did this answer your question?